Master Claude AI (Free Guide)
The professionals pulling ahead aren't working more. They're using Claude.
Our free guide will show you how to:
Configure Claude to be the perfect assistant
Master AI-powered content creation
Transform complex data into actionable strategies
Harness Claude’s full potential
Transform your workflow with AI and stay ahead of the curve with this comprehensive guide to using Claude at work.
Introduction
The question is no longer whether an assistant can do the work. It is which one you trust with your calendar, and what you refuse to let it touch.
This fall, the ground moved again. Between August and October, a wave of personal AI assistants arrived that do not wait for a question at all. xAI opened the beta of Grok Bot on August 11 (Mercer, 2026). Meta launched Muse on September 8 (Ortutay, 2026), and OpenAI followed with dots on September 29 (Nogueira, 2026). Instinct, an assistant you simply text, spread by invitation (AI Chief Editorial Staff, 2026), while the open-source Hermes Agent gave technical users a version they can run themselves (xAI, 2026).
What strikes me most is who can now reach them. Not long ago, an assistant that reads your calendar, drafts your email, and books your travel belonged to executives with human staff. Today Meta says Muse is free for most of what people need, with paid plans at $20 and $100 a month (Dubois, 2026). That access reaches the principal in a small rural district as surely as the superintendent with a full cabinet.
Vibe coding, a term AI pioneer Andrej Karpathy coined in February 2025, lets people build software by describing what they want rather than writing the code themselves (Fowler, 2026). Music producer Rick Rubin expanded the idea in The Way of Code, a book he created with Anthropic (Dela Cruz, 2025). The same shift is now reaching everyday office work, which Microsoft calls "vibe working" (Fried, 2025). It widens access to advanced technology by shifting the creator's role from technical execution to intent and curation.
Why a Leader Would Want One
When I started Valgar LLC, I noticed something I had not expected. Names, dates, and details no longer came back to me as easily as they did in my superintendent years. Rather than fight it, I looked for tools that would help. I decided to try the latest AI-based tools: personal assistants. After testing a few of them, I landed on Muse because it was the most engaging to use. Your preferences might differ, but the information in this issue may help you figure out which would be best for you.
How can they help? Start with time. In the first nationally representative study of how principals spend their days, principals averaged nearly 60 hours a week, and the largest share of that time, 31 percent, went to administrative tasks like paperwork and scheduling (Sparks, 2016). Every hour spent chasing a document, untangling a calendar, or drafting a routine reply is an hour not spent in classrooms, with teachers, or with families. A personal assistant takes aim at that 31 percent. It finds the file, flags the email that cannot wait, and holds the walkthrough on the calendar so it does not disappear. The case is not that the assistant leads, but that it gives back the time leading requires.
A browser finds information. A chatbot answers your question. A personal assistant acts on your behalf. These tools connect to the accounts you already use, keep working after you close the app, and take real actions: sending email, booking travel, filling out forms, completing purchases (Fernandez, 2026). Meta requires your approval before sensitive steps like sending an email or finishing a transaction (Levytam, 2026).These tools differ in where they live, what they cost, and how much they ask of you.
Muse (Meta). Muse works through its own app, the web, or WhatsApp (Fernandez, 2026; Ortutay, 2026), and it is open to US adults 18 and older (Ortutay, 2026). You can opt out of model training, and Meta says Muse does not share conversations with its advertising systems (ETV Bharat Tech Team, 2026). Muse suits the leader who wants to start today with nothing to install.
Grok Bot (xAI). Grok Bot gives you a team of always-on bots that work from their own cloud computer (Mercer, 2026). Its strength is reach, with connectors to tools like Gmail, Google Drive, and Notion (PortEden Team, 2026), and now beehiiv (AlphaSignal Newsroom, 2026). It is not cheap: Grok Bot comes with xAI's higher-end plans, such as Cursor Ultra at $200 a month (xAI, n.d.-b). Grok Bot suits the leader whose work runs across many platforms.
Instinct. There is no app to learn. You text it through iMessage, WhatsApp, or email (AI Chief Editorial Staff, 2026). It remains invitation-only, and early testers raised serious privacy concerns (Perez, 2026). Instinct suits the leader who lives in text messages.
Hermes Agent (Nous Research). Hermes is open-source software that runs on your own computer or server, remembers across sessions, and works through apps like WhatsApp and Telegram (xAI, 2026). It requires technical setup and upkeep (Enterprise DNA, 2026). Hermes suits the technically comfortable leader or a district technology team.
Dots (OpenAI). Dots live inside ChatGPT, rolling out to Pro and Business Premium subscribers with the first dot included at no extra cost, and they reach more than 4,000 apps (Nogueira, 2026). Enterprise customers, including eligible education organizations, can use dots once an administrator turns them on (Chowdhry, 2026). Dots suit the district already running ChatGPT under administrator controls.
Beyond the Search Bar
For instructional leaders, the uses fall into three tiers, each asking for more trust than the last.
Everyday work. An assistant can sort the morning inbox and surface what cannot wait: the parent escalation, the board member's question. It can protect walkthrough time on your calendar. It can read a board memo at 10 p.m., when no colleague is awake to push back on it.
Connected platforms. Once an assistant reaches your documents, it retrieves what you already own. Picture a principal the morning of a data meeting, asking for every note from the third-grade team's fall PLC meetings and a one-page summary of its intervention decisions. The notes sit in Drive or SharePoint. The assistant finds them in seconds. With Grok Bot's beehiiv connector, a bot can even prepare a newsletter draft for editorial review (AlphaSignal Newsroom, 2026). The draft still waits for a person.
Your own data. Grok and several rivals accept custom connectors built on the Model Context Protocol, an open standard that lets an assistant work with almost any database or internal tool (xAI, n.d.-a). A district could ask how attendance at one school compares with last year and get an answer from its own records. Here the boundary is firm: Grok connects only to servers it can reach over the public internet (xAI, n.d.-a), and your student information system sits behind a firewall for good reason. Start with public data: state accountability results, budgets, board minutes. Opening private records is a decision for your technology director and your board, not a settings screen.
Skepticism Is Part of Readiness
In RAND's national surveys, about 60 percent of responding principals said they use AI for administrative work (Banerji, 2025). As of spring 2025, fewer than half, 45 percent, said their school or district had a policy on AI use (Ascione, 2025). Assistants widen that gap, because they do not just write. They act.
Instinct shows what happens when trust outruns safeguards. TechCrunch reported that testers saw it still summarizing their inboxes after they had disconnected Google access (Perez, 2026). Read the privacy terms before you connect anything.
A superintendent's inbox holds discipline cases, special education conversations, and personnel matters. Some institutions have already drawn the line. The University of Tennessee's technology office puts FERPA-protected student information off-limits in free, public AI tools (University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Office of Innovative Technologies, 2026). Connecting an assistant to district email is not a personal choice. It is a district data decision.
Then there is money. Muse can complete purchases with a one-time card number (Fernandez, 2026). I have not connected my bank account to any of these tools, and I do not trust them with it, yet. I’ll let Muse earn greater access by doing small jobs well. Anything that sends, spends, or deletes stays behind my approval.
Choosing Your Option
Start with Muse if you want an engaging, low-cost place to begin. Look at Grok Bot if your work spans many platforms, Instinct if you would rather text, Hermes if your district wants its data under its own roof, and dots if you already run ChatGPT under administrator controls.
The leaders who struggle will not be the ones who chose the wrong assistant. They will be the ones who connected everything on the first day. Ready or not, they are here.
References
AI Chief Editorial Staff. (2026, October 9). Instinct was the buzziest AI agent around: Can it survive Muse? AIChief. https://aichief.com/news/instinct-was-the-buzziest-ai-agent-around-can-it-survive-muse/
AlphaSignal Newsroom. (2026). xAI's Grok Bot runs tasks 3x faster and trades stocks on your behalf. AlphaSignal. https://alphasignal.ai/news/xai-s-grok-bot-runs-tasks-3x-faster-and-trades-stocks-on-your-behalf
Ascione, L. (2025, December 4). AI use is on the rise, but is guidance keeping pace? eSchool News. https://www.eschoolnews.com/digital-learning/2026/01/02/ai-use-is-on-the-rise-but-is-guidance-keeping-pace/
Banerji, O. (2025, February 14). Teachers and principals are turning to AI. Here's how. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/technology/teachers-and-principals-are-turning-to-ai-heres-how/2025/02
Chowdhry, A. (2026, September 29). OpenAI unveils Dots, GPT-6.1 Sol, $500 Pro tier, and new enterprise AI tools. Pulse 2.0. https://pulse2.com/openai-unveils-dots-gpt-6-1-sol-500-pro-tier-and-new-enterprise-ai-tools/
Dela Cruz, J. (2025, May 27). Rick Rubin collaborates with Anthropic to simplify AI coding for everyone. DesignRush. https://news.designrush.com/rick-rubin-anthropic-ai-coding
Dubois, N. (2026, September 9). Meta Muse personal AI agent launch 2026. Tech Insider. https://tech-insider.org/meta-muse-personal-ai-agent-launch-2026/
Enterprise DNA. (2026, June 1). Hermes Agent [Directory listing]. https://enterprisedna.co/directories/apps/hermes-agent
ETV Bharat Tech Team. (2026, September 9). Meta launches Muse, a personal AI agent that can handle tasks and make payments for you. ETV Bharat. https://www.etvbharat.com/amp/en/technology/meta-launches-muse-a-personal-ai-agent-that-can-handle-tasks-and-make-payments-for-you-enn26090901759
Fernandez, A. (2026, September 9). Meta launches Muse, an AI agent that books, fills forms and buys. Relevant Audience. https://www.relevantaudience.com/ai/meta-muse-personal-ai-agent-launch/
Fowler, M. (2026, May 21). Vibe coding. martinfowler.com. https://martinfowler.com/bliki/VibeCoding.html
Fried, I. (2025, September 29). Microsoft wants to make "vibe working" a thing. Axios. https://www.axios.com/2025/09/29/vibe-working-microsoft-agent-mode
Levytam, S. (2026, September 8). Meta launches Muse, a personal AI agent that handles everyday tasks. iClarified. https://www.iclarified.com/102030/meta-launches-muse-a-personal-ai-agent-that-handles-everyday-tasks
Mercer, E. (2026, August 11). xAI launches Grok Bot, always-on AI teammates with their own cloud computers. Unite.AI. https://www.unite.ai/xai-launches-grok-bot-always-on-ai-teammates-with-their-own-cloud-computers/
Nogueira, C. (2026, September 30). OpenAI launches dots, always-on ChatGPT agents with their own computers. Betanews. https://betanews.com/article/openai-dots-agents-chatgpt/
OpenAI. (2022, November 30). Introducing ChatGPT. https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/
Ortutay, B. (2026, September 8). Meta launches personal AI agent, Muse, emphasizes safety and privacy. Associated Press. https://www.cp24.com/news/money/2026/09/08/meta-launches-personal-ai-agent-muse-emphasizes-safety-and-privacy/
Perez, S. (2026, August 24). Instinct's powerful AI assistant is raising privacy and security concerns. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2026/08/24/instincts-powerful-ai-assistant-is-raising-privacy-and-security-concerns/
PortEden Team. (2026, May 29). Grok connectors: What they are and how to secure them. PortEden. https://porteden.com/blog/grok-connectors/
Sparks, S. D. (2016, November 1). Principals work 60-hour weeks, study finds. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/11/02/principals-work-60-hour-weeks-study-finds.html
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Office of Innovative Technologies. (2026, October 12). Think before you type: AI tools and student privacy. https://oit.utk.edu/news/think-before-you-type-ai-tools-and-student-privacy/
xAI. (2026, May 15). Connect Grok to Hermes Agent. https://x.ai/news/grok-hermes
xAI. (n.d.-a). Connectors [Documentation]. https://docs.x.ai/grok/connectors
xAI. (n.d.-b). Grok Bot [Product and pricing page]. https://x.ai/bot
The Video Edition
Catch the weekly video edition of the EDL Newsletter on YouTube.
Let's Talk
|
DISTRICT LEADER PODCAST
Slowing the Game Down
This week’s issue asks what AI assistants can take off a leader’s plate, and what must stay in human hands. Dr. L. Oliver Robinson’s conversation answers the second half. He came to the superintendency from economics, led Shenendehowa for two decades, and never stopped studying the craft. He talks about building resilient systems by institutionalizing change, seeing K-12 as a 13-year odyssey, and choosing dialogue over debate. His call to slow the game down lands differently in a season when every tool promises speed. Listen for his insight from retirement: moving beyond the clock to the significance of the moment.
EDUPRENEURS NETWORK • DEEP DIVE
Edupreneurship: Managing Information to Support Your Venture
Earlier in this issue I mentioned the system I built when I started Valgar. This essay lays it out in full: how I capture, organize, and retrieve information, and what I learned along the way. Those are the same three jobs this week's assistants now offer to take off our plates. The tools have changed since I wrote that essay. The discipline has not. If you build or sell for schools, that discipline is what your district clients will expect from any assistant you put in front of them.
From the Bookshelf - Thought Leadership
Thought Leadership in Education: A Comprehensive Exploration of Transformative Educational Ideas
Chapter 5: Digital Transformation and Educational Thought Leadership
In Chapter 5, I write about the space every leader has to find between knee-jerk rejection of digital tools and the belief that technology fixes everything. Personal assistants test that balance in a new way, because they act on our behalf. The chapter's guidance still holds: start with the why, put teachers at the center, take it slow, and let the evidence guide you. Its section on ethics names the questions this issue raises, from who owns the data to how much control a tool should have. The best leaders, as I put it there, "encourage us to think critically about how it fits into the broader goals of education."
This week: Read the "Guiding Implementation: Beyond Technophobia and Techno-Utopianism" and "Addressing Ethical Questions in Educational Technology" sections in Chapter 5. Then ask yourself: if an assistant took one task off your plate tomorrow, which learning goal would you hold it to?
Additional Resources
